Speech number
four
In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the
Merciful
...meanwhile this was a necessary reminder that all governments
should heed. From the advent of Islam, Muslims have been the guardians
of the true religion of Islam even when they lost their rights for the
sake of protecting the religion. Hazrat Amir al-Mu`minin, the
Commander of the Faithful (pbuh), co-operated with the caliphs because
outwardly they followed the religious precepts, and chaos did not
prevail until
Mu`awiya came to power and he deviated from the path and
customs
of the caliphs and transformed the caliphate into a
monarchy. Under such circumstances, Imam `Ali had no choice but to rise
up against him, for according to the rules of religion and logic, he
could not tolerate Mu`awiya to remain in that post for a single day.
Those of his advisers who out of ignorance advised Imam `Ali to wait
until his rule became stronger and then dismiss Mu`awiya did not know
that had he waited, he would have met with objections from the Muslims
and after strengthening his position, he would not have been able to
dismiss Mu`awiya.
Nowadays, there may be some uninformed people who believe it would have
been better if Imam `Ali had made his position stronger and then
dismissed Mu`awiya, but they are mistaken. Thus, when Imam `Ali realized
that a cruel government was coming to power, revolt was a divine duty
and he carried it out.
In this way too the infallible Imams revolted, even if
they were few in number, they would fight until the death in order to
carry out their religious duties. Whenever one of the Imams saw that
revolt was not appropriate, he stayed at home and propagated Islam
instead. This was the way from the beginning of Islam.
The `ulama and leaders of Islam have always advised the people
to maintain their composure. It was not so long ago that the Great
Mirza, the late Hajj Mirza Muhammad Hassan
Shirazi lived. He was a great intellectual thinker who lived in Samarra,
and although he advocated quietism and
reconciliation , when he realized that Islam was in
danger and the cruel king at that time wanted to wipe out Islam by using
foreign companies, this old man sitting in a small city with only three
hundred theology students around him was forced to admonish the despotic
king. His writings have been preserved. That king didn't listen and with
offensive and impolite statements he defied the lofty position of this
great scholar until the latter was forced to say a word so that
independence could be restored.
After realising that Iraq was exposed to danger, the
late Mirza Muhammad
Taqi Shirazi spoke out in support of the Arabs and changed matters.
If he had not done so, Iraq would have been destroyed. All Islamic
states are indebted to this group of men (the clergymen), it is they
who, up until now, have guarded their independence. They are one of the
resources of the Islamic countries, and it is through their counsel that
arrogant people are silenced. By the same token, when the clergy see
that Islam is in danger they strive as much as possible and if they feel
that by making issues public knowledge, by giving speeches and sending
messages the danger can be averted, so be it, but if not, they have no
choice but to rise up and take action. The clergy wish to see harmony
and unity exist between all Muslims, however they can only maintain
their silence in so far as national independence is not endangered by
things that maybe even the government is unaware of or does not
understand. These duties are determined by religion, it's not that the
`ulama say something of their own accord; this kind of uprising
is that which is stipulated by religion and the Holy Qur'an.
On the evening before the people were to go to the Sayyid Azizullah
Mosque to pray for the awakening of the government,
I was informed that the latter was planning to resist. Under such
circumstances, I realised that the ulama had another duty. I made the final decision whilst praying
and beseeching the Almighty God and I told no one, but God showed
kindness towards the Shah, the government and the nation. If, God
forbid, any disrespect had been aimed at the `ulama of Tehran, I
would have made a grave decision, but around midnight the government realized
that it couldn't withstand the power of the people, and that
same night it took a document from the great `ulama of Tehran so
that the problem would be resolved.
The following morning a telegram also arrived in Qum while I was at Mr.
Shari`atmadari's home.
The telegram was a good sign, but there was fear of deceit until news of
the annulment of the Provincial and District Councils Bill was published
in the newspapers after several communications between here and Tehran.
However, they are not finished speaking yet. Concerning these town
council laws that he claims have been accepted by the `ulama,
they have not been accepted, they have been objected to. Furthermore,
the laws governing the Provincial and District Councils cannot be
compared with those for the town councils, which are said to be
"similar," and to make such a comparison is
erroneous. However, in both cases, being male and Muslim has been
included and stipulated in the text of the law. In
addition to this, we are the ones to compel them to uphold what they
themselves are committed
to. Not that the constitutional law is complete and final in our
opinion, but if the `ulama refer to the law it is because of the
second article of the amendment to the Constitution which invalidates
the legality of any law which opposes the Holy
Qur'an. For we do not concern ourselves with these laws,
we are concerned only with the Islamic laws. The `ulama of Islam
are interested in the laws of the Qur'an and the traditions of the
Prophet and the Imams, anything that agrees with the Qur'an we will
humbly submit to and anything which is incompatible with the religion
and violates the Islamic laws, be that the constitutional law or even
international laws, we will
oppose.
Praise be to God the matter is now over; Mr Asadullah `Alam was
warned that this matter must be ended and thank God it has ended. We are
grateful that (praise be to God) it ended without a battle or war,
without a drop of blood being shed. Such a matter, which could have
ended in a great national uprising and could have moved tribes, ended
with not even one person being slapped! During small, local uprisings
and wars which involve thousands of people often a few are killed, and
several are wounded, it is not possible that during an uprising of
twenty million not even one person's nose bleeds! The government doesn't
realize who prevented chaos or battle from occurring. They should come
and see what has been written in the letters we have received and what
has been said by the people who came to talk to
us. They came to us with tears in their eyes, "Give us an order, a
word from you that our souls will have everlasting life and see what
happens." We told them that we did not ask that of them. But if a single
word had been issued there would have been an explosion. Who quenched
this fire? Why doesn't the government want to believe this? Why is it
trying with all its might to destroy this great force (the clergy) which
is the support of the independence of the country? God knows I am filled
with sorrow. It is the clergy who have adapted to this situation and are
serving the independence of this country. Why doesn't the government
understand what it has done to our education? Why doesn't it rely on the
clergy? Why with the death of one `alem does the world become devastated,
but when the government fails the people celebrate?
The government should be such that if it suffers a failure the people
mourn and rise up to protect it. It can't attract support itself, maybe
it could if the people saw that it wanted what was best for Muslims; if
the people saw that the
government protected the interests of the Muslims, they would buy
bonds and sell their homes and use the money for the good of the
Muslims. Why is the press allowed to say such
things? Why are they so discourteous and unjust? If the clergy were to
go, the country would have no backbone. Why is the press free to say
whatever
it wants (against the clergy)? Why are the events of January 7 (Dey
17) freely celebrated?
These things create hatred. Don't make the country's king hated. We
advise you not to turn January 7 into a day of celebration.
We believe this to be a heinous act. Protect this country. The events of
January 7 do not signify progress. The progress of a nation lies with
its universities and look at what you have done to them. For over a
hundred years we have had universities and yet when a king wants to have
a tonsillectomy we must bring a doctor here from another country.
Foreigners must build the Karaj
Dam. Foreigners must come even to build a road. Do international obligations demand this? If you have
doctors and engineers you have education. If you say you have education,
you have wealth, you have students, you have doctors and engineers; so
why do you hire them from outside the country? Why do you pay foreigners
a hundred thousand tumans a month?! Answer this! If you have no answer,
then pity this country! For a hundred years it has had universities but
it has no doctors, no engineers... This is what the clergy have to say.
The clergy are not against the economical development of this country,
they have been slandered. For five hundred years the clergy have
administered and protected the
entire world. One only needs to look at history. Even though the
caliphs themselves were oppressors, they governed the world through an
Islamic system. Doesn't Islam have a way for development? Which economic
matter did the `ulama
oppose? You wanted to build dams, did they
stand in your way? You wanted to import industries, did they stop you?
We said don't destroy the steel plant. Do you think that we don't know
what you have done to the
Karaj Steel Plant? The `ulama are not against independence;
the creed of the `ulama is independence and religion demands that
we call for it. But we have no means at our disposal; we do not govern
the newspapers, and they have presented the `ulama in an
unfavourable light. Twenty odd years have passed since the scandalous
forced removal of the Islamic veil (kashf hijab) took
place. Check and see what you have done. You've put women into the
offices, and every office they've been put into has become paralyzed.
For the moment this is not a common practice, the `ulama
say do
not let it become so; don't spread it to the provinces. If women are put
into an organization it will upset conditions there. Do you want women
to provide your independence?
Those that you follow are exploring space while you fool around with
(the rights of) your women.
Don't present your `ulama
unfavourably to the
world. This is a shameful act on your part. These are the problems, this
is the advice, but what good is it? Those who should hear it are not
here, and even if there were someone here who could make the government
understand that which pains our hearts, he would not do so.
But you gentlemen, your responsibility, at any post
which you might hold is to guard Islam's reputation. If even one of your
people acts dishonourably the `ulama
in general will be seen in
an unfavourable light. Just because others speak unfavourably, don't you
too present yourselves in a bad light. Our involvement in these events
has brought about some sweet experiences and some bitter ones. We have
just mentioned the sweet ones, which were the sentiments of the people, May God grant them predominance and victory. The bitter ones came from
the actions of a few people, May God forgive them. It is God's will that the life and independence of the nation
lies in your hands. Whatever happens is either in your favour or against
you. If events go against you, don't let this defeat you
psychologically. An outward defeat is not important, what is important
is a psychological defeat. If a man is defeated spiritually he is as
good as dead. For you that have support from God, you that are the
clergy, you that your hearts are otherworldly, there is no defeat in
this world; this world is nothing, he who is connected to God will never
suffer defeat. Defeat belongs to those whose aspirations are of this
world. When one's aspirations are of this world, one will be defeated.
If one's aspirations are the unseen and the mysteries behind it, there
is no failure. Failure is for the desperate, it belongs to those who
trust the Devil and to those whose hearts have been filled with love for
the wealth of this world. If you are defeated in some way, your hearts
should be strong, stand firm until the last person. Don't believe that
if so-and-so fails it is finished. No! You are a monotheist. You are a
Muslim. You are connected to God and God cannot be defeated. So lose
not heart nor fall into despair, for ye must gain mastery if ye are true in
faith.
If you win, don't lose your heads, be strong. You should neither be
filled with fear nor be too daring. It is not right now to shout
obscenities at the government. You are above saying that which is
unbefitting your position.
From today we are setting about our business. Over the
two months since this event occurred, we haven't been able to work
properly, there were nights when I slept for only two hours. From now on
we should occupy ourselves with studying which is greater than any other
means of worship, if the heart is pure. Once again if we see a foreign
devil focusing on our nation, we will act in the same way, the
government will be the same and the nation will be the same. Such a
gathering which is costly for others can be arranged by us with a single
word. The people realize that we are their friends, and they are fond of
their friends. The clergy are the fathers of the people, and they are
fond of their children. In the middle of the night, an old
man announces: "Let us gather and pray," and Tehran moves! Another
old man here writes: "We want to have a prayer gathering" and see what
happens! Why? Because the people perceive that the `ulama
have
their best interests at heart, the `ulama
are righteous people,
they are not corrupt. We would like the government to be like this also.
We would like it if when a day of national mourning is announced
everyone mourns, not the opposite. And just as the hearts of the people
are attentive to the clergy and gather at their bidding, we would like
them to be like this also with the government.
From Rey they wrote, "We are five thousand people ready
with our shrouds in hand;" from
Japalaq: "We are one hundred thousand individuals awaiting your
orders." From Lorestan they wrote: "We are tribes ready with our
shrouds." The people are aware. Can a country which is aware be
backward? Get rid of your weapons and then in Tehran, for example,
announce that you will hold a gathering in the east, and we will
announce one in the west; announce a gathering in Qum and we will
announce one twelve kilometres from there in Khak Faraj; you hold one
close by and we will hold one far away. Go to Khuzestan, anywhere, and
do the same so that you will see just how important this support is for
you.
I advise the king of this nation not to lose this force. Two events
occurred; one was the death of Ayatullah
Burujirdi and the other was the death of one of their people; and we all saw what
happened. They say the akhunds are nothing. How can they say
this?! You say that you don't have anything to do with the akhunds,
well the akhunds have something to say to you! Religious counsel
is compulsory, to abandon it might even be a capital sin. It is the duty
of the `ulama to counsel everyone throughout the nation, from the
Shah down.
This is the way to the people's hearts, the Muslim
people's hearts will be won over through Islam. We understand what makes
their hearts beat, the hearts of the Muslim people must be attracted by
means of Islam for without doubt in the remembrance of God do hearts
find satisfaction.
All hearts are in God's hands. The converter of all hearts is God. Focus
your attention on God so that the hearts of the people will focus on
you. The people of learning do this, you (the government) must also be
like this. We are not saying wear a turban, rather we say come to
understand that which the clergy have understood. We say the government
should govern the people well so that they understand that the
government has their best interests at heart. But if the people see
that's not how it really is, they'll begin to ask: "When will this
government be destroyed?"
Oh government, oh wretched ones. The conquest of a
country is nothing - and fortunately you have not achieved this - what
is important is the conquest of hearts. If you want to, then do it. If
not, don't. It's up
to you.
May God's peace and blessings be upon you.
1- Mu`awiya ibn Abu Sufyan (607 - 80 AD) first caliph of the
Umayyad dynasty accepted Islam on the day Mecca was conquered (630 AD).
He was the commander of the army during the caliphate of Abu Bakr and
at the time of Umar he was first the governor of Jordan and then
governor of Damascus, and at the time of Uthman he was responsible for
the entire principality of Syria. After the death of Uthman,
Hazrat `Ali (pbuh) was proclaimed caliph and issued orders for
Mu`awiya's dismissal. However, Mu`awiya did not comply with Imam `Ali's
orders and accused him of involvement in the murder of Uthman and
demanded vengeance for his death. During the battle of Siffin, which was
fought between Mu`awiya's troops and those of Hazrat Ali, `Amr
ibn-al-`As, Mu`awiya's army commander, on seeing the battle going in
`Ali's favour, resorted to a ruse and ordered his soldiers to fasten
copies of the Qur'an to their lances and hold them up in the air. This
move brought about a dispute amongst `Ali's followers, the battle was
ended and Mu`awiya remained in his principality. After Imam Ali's
martyrdom, his son Imam Hassan (pbuh) was forced into a conditional
peace with Mu`awiya because of the actions of his traitorous troops and
commanders and eventually relinquished the caliphate to him in 661 AD.
From this date on, Mu`awiya called himself the official Muslim caliph.
See Philip K. Hitti's History of the Arabs and S.H.M. Jafri's
The Origins and Early Development of Shi`a Islam.
2- Mu`awiya opposed the
expulsion order. Moghayyar ibn Sho`beh and Ibn `Abbas (Imam `Ali's
cousin) did not agree with Mu`awiya's expulsion and recommended that
Imam `Ali be lenient and condescending for two years until the
people of Syria swore allegiance to him, and then take action against
him. But Imam `Ali would not accept that Mu`awiya rule over the lives
and wealth of the Muslim people for even a short period of time.
3- Ayatullah Mirza Muhammad
Hassan Shirazi (1812-1894 AD), better known as Mirza Shirazi the Great
I, was the most learned marja` of his era and was one of the
highest ranking `ulama. He issued the famous order for the
tobacco boycott. Early in his life he left Shiraz and went to study with
the `ulama in Isfahan; from there he went to Iraq (to the atabat,
i.e. the major centres of Shi`i learning in Iraq: the holy shrines in
Karbala, Najaf and Kazimayn). There he studied under Shaykh Morteza
Ansari, before he himself began to teach. During the period that he was
marja`-i taqlid in 1891, the Qajar Shah, Nasir al-Din, signed a
contract with an English company granting it a fifty-year monopoly over
the distribution and exportation of tobacco. As concern over the
concession swept through the country, Ayatullah Shirazi issued a fatwa
stating that the use of tobacco in whatever form was forbidden
(haram) and was tantamount to declaring war with Imam Zaman (the
Twelfth Imam) in order to curtail the spread of British influence in the
country. Consequently, Nasir al-Din Shah was faced with no alternative
but to annul the concession.
4- The city of Samarra is of
interest to Muslims and is a famous place of Shi`i pilgrimage. This city
is located in Iraq, 120 km north of Baghdad and lies on the east bank of
the Tigris river. Several times the ancient city of Samarra has been
destroyed and rebuilt. It is the burial site of Imam `Ali al-Naqi
(pbuh), the tenth Imam, and Imam Hassan `Askari (pbuh), the eleventh
Imam. There is also a famous basement there which is said to be the
place where the twelfth Imam of the Shi`a, Imam Mahdi (May God hasten
his renewed manifestation) went into occultation. The ancient name of
this city was Surra man ra'a which means whoever sees it shall be
gladdened.
5- Ayatullah Mirza Muhammad Taqi Shirazi (d 1921
AD), better known as Mirza Mojahid II, was one of the great Shi`i
marja` and was one of Mirza Shirazi the Great's students. He was
a leading force (after Ayatullah Sayyid Kazem Tabataba'i) in the
resistance by the Shi`i `ulama opposed to the imposition of
British rule on Iraq at the end of the First World War. His requisition
read as follows: "It is the religious duty of the Iraqi people to demand
their rights."
6- The numerous telegrams sent
from the `ulama to `Alam's government requesting the abolition of
the Provincial and District Councils Bill and the government's refusal
to reply, forced the clergy of Tehran to seek assistance from
Almighty God and in order to remind the people of important matters they
decided to hold a gathering at the Sayyid Azizullah Mosque on Thursday
morning November 29, 1962 (Azar 8, 1341 AHS). This information was
disseminated amongst the people by way of leaflets. The great elderly
clergymen Ayatullah Bihbihani and Ayatullah Tunakabuni decided to remain
in the Sayyid Azizullah Mosque until the Provincial and District
Councils Bill was annulled. This news caused public uproar, and the
pious people, who could not bear to see their marja` and
religious leaders inconvenienced and dissatisfied in this way, decided
to join them in the mosque to express their opposition to the
government. The Sayyid Azizullah Mosque is one of the major mosques in
Tehran and was an Islamic revolutionary base during the time of the
resurgence and is located within Tehran's main bazaar.
7- Praying and weeping.
8- As the Provincial and
District Council disturbances continued and the `ulama
of Tehran
issued an invitation to the people to join them in a protest gathering
at the Sayyid Azizullah Mosque on November 29, 1962 (Azar 8, 1341
AHS), `Alam's government felt increasingly threatened. That same night
it held a meeting during which the Provincial and District Councils Bill
was rescinded and notification was sent to the `ulama
of Tehran.
Also, in order to prevent the prayer gathering of the next day, the
government decided to send `Emad Torbatti, the Prime Minister's
representative, in the middle of the night to the homes of the respected
clergymen Bihbihani, Khansari, Amoli, Tunakabuni, to obtain their
signatures at the bottom of a document declaring the cancellation of the
aforementioned gathering. At 5 a.m. this document was distributed in the
Tehran Bazaar and the surrounding streets. It stated: "The Prime
Minister has announced that the bill concerning the election for
Provincial and District Councils which was ratified by the government
will not be implemented. Therefore, thanks to all the Muslims' efforts,
the gathering on Thursday Rajab 1, (November 29) which was supposed to
be held in the Sayyid Azizullah Mosque is no longer necessary."
9- The telegram containing the
news of the abolition of the Provincial and District Councils Bill was
sent to Mr. Sayyid Kazem Shari`atmadari and the great Ayatullahs
Gulpaygani and Najafi-Marashi in Qum from the Prime Minister's
palace. Refraining from sending a telegram to Imam Khomeini was evidence
of the regime's anger regarding his stance.
10- Even though the government
had promised to publish news of the bill's annulment in the newspapers,
it considered it sufficient merely to send telegrams to the great
maraji' and `ulama. This greatly angered Imam and the
other clergymen. Thus, by sending a letter and special messenger to
Tehran and other cities, Imam requested that the clergy continue in
their opposition until news of the annulment be published in the
newspapers. This action forced the Prime Minister to announce the
abolition of the bill during an interview on December 1, 1962 (Azar 10,
1341 AHS). After this, the newspaper headlines read: "The government has
revoked the bill dated October 6, 1962 (Mehr 14, 1341 AHS)."
11- After the clergy and
the people had waited one month for an answer regarding the government's
opinion, on Monday October 14, 1962 (Mehr 22, 1341 AHS) the Prime
Minister in a
telegram to Mr.
Sayyid Kazem Shari`atmadari and the great Ayatullahs Najafi-Marashi and
Gulpaygani stated: "...concerning the government's silence on the issue
of the non-participation of women in the Provincial and District
Councils, I must remind the worthy gentlemen that the conditions
concerning this bill are the same as those which apply to the elections
for the town councils' bill which was ratified seven years ago and to
which no opposition has ever been raised." Imam Khomeini in reply to
questions put to him by the merchants and businessmen of Qum regarding
his views on the Prime Minister's interview dated December 12, 1962
(Azar 21, 1341 AHS) rejected `Alam's claims concerning the similarity of
the bill with the town council bill. His statements in this regard were
later published as his declaration in reply to the Prime Minister. See
Nihzat-i Ruhaniyun-i Iran, Volume 3, pp. 112-115.
12- This phrase is contained
in the irrevocable law and is one of the major rules of religious
jurisprudence, according to which in legal and juristical issues the
people are expected to comply with the precepts of their religion and
the laws which they themselves have chosen. Imam's intention here is
to draw attention to the contradictory nature of the Provincial and
District Councils Bill with the constitutional law which the government
is bound to. By referring to the aforesaid rule, he emphasized
that his
words did not constitute a recognition of the legitimacy of the
constitutional or any other law, for that came from the law's compliance
with the laws of the religion. For further information concerning
irrevocable laws see Wasa'il al-Shi`a Vol. 15, (Kitab al-Talaq),
(Abwab Muqaddamata wa Shara'ita) Chapter 30.
13- The second amendment to
the constitutional law declared that: "The Holy National Consultative
Assembly, which has been established through the assistance and favour
of the twelfth Imam (May God hasten his renewed manifestation),
should not at any time allow any of its articles of laws to contradict
the rules of Islam or the laws of Hazrat Khairol- Anam
(Hazrat Muhammad, upon whom be peace). It is obvious that the
responsibility for determining which laws are at variance with the laws
of Islam is and has been with the most learned `ulama, (May God
prolong their beneficial existence). Therefore, it is officially decided
that in any period of time a group of not less than five Islamic
jurisprudents (mujtahids) and fuqaha who are aware of
current events will be selected to do this. Thus, the most learned
`ulama and maraji`-i taqlid
will introduce twenty names
from amongst the `ulama, who are qualified, to the National
Consultative Assembly. Five or more will be chosen by unanimous vote or
by drawing lots, and will be recognised as members so that all the
articles proposed to the Majlis are carefully analysed and negotiated,
and every article which is at variance with the holy laws of Islam is
rescinded. The vote of this group of `ulama
must be obeyed and
followed, and this article is irrevocable until Imam Mahdi's
appearance."
14- Meaning that we will not
accept any law except Islamic law, the laws of the Constitution which
follow religious law are accepted by us.
15- The Shah and `Alam's
government wanted to pass the Provincial and District Council Bill and
violate Islam and the Constitution in the name of progress and using the
excuse of the prevailing
circumstances and
their international obligations. The Shah in answer to a telegram sent
by the maraji` announced these changes to be trivial and to have
arisen from the current situation. In one of his speeches, `Alam, while
condemning any revolt, implicitly described the current activities of
the `ulama as being reactionary measures and added that the
wheels of time could not be turned back and the government would not
change its mind concerning the reform programmes.
16- The high-ranking
`ulama of the theology centres inside the country, clergymen,
scholars, preachers, merchants, tradesmen and religious groups supported
the actions of the maraji` of Qum for the abolition of the
Provincial and District Councils Bill in successive letters,
telegrams and papers which contained thousands of signatures. They
regularly expressed to the Shah and the government, and especially the
maraji', the aversion and apprehension of the local citizens concerning
the bill, and requested the abolition of the bill.
17- Refers to the funeral and
burial ceremony of the great Shi`i marja` Ayatullah Burujirdi
(pbuh) the death of whom millions of Shi`i Muslims throughout the world
mourned.
18- Refers to the defeat of
`Alam's government by the clergy over the Provincial and District
Councils Bill. After its annulment, people in many cities put up lights
and celebrated the victory of Islam and the clergy. Some of the
poets even composed poems to mark the occasion. To see the role of
the leadership of Imam Khomeini at that time refer to the poem on page
205 in the book Barrasi va Tahlili az Nihzat-i Imam Khomeini,
Vol. 1. Also see Nihzat-i Ruhaniyun-i Iran, Vol. 3, pp.
185-193.
19- Imam's criticism is aimed at the freedom
allowed the press at that time to speak about the clergy and sacred
things in an insolent manner.
20- The government-controlled
press wrote: "If the `ulama
are against the progress and
advancement which His Highness proclaims, then they can leave the
country."
21- The Pahlavi regime used
propagation and false rumour in its fight against the clergy in the
Provincial and District Councils Bill disturbances in order to make the
clergy and the maraji`s non-reactionary struggle look despicable
and portray the clergy's uprising as being instigated by the feudal
landowners and capitalists, and in this way turn the peasants against
the clergy. The magazine Khusheh
wrote: "One of the great
landowners living abroad has sent large sums of money from Europe as
sahm-i imam money to be put at the disposal of the clergy so that
they can take action on behalf of the landowners."
22- After the Constitutional
Revolution from the middle of 1927, some circles close to Riza Khan
began talking about the forced removal of the women's Islamic veil
(kashf hijab) and by the New Year of 1928 (1307 AHS), Riza
Khan's wife and daughters appeared in public without the Islamic
covering. The law calling for the removal of hijab was implemented after
Riza Khan's return from Turkey (in 1934) on January 7, 1935 (Dey 17,
1341 AHS). On this day, Riza Khan, accompanied by his wife and two
daughters, attended the opening ceremonies for a college along with his
ministers and their wives who had removed their Islamic covering. At
this ceremony, Riza Khan addressed the women saying: "We have broken the
prison bars! Now the freed prisoners can make beautiful homes instead of
cages." See Hijab va Kashf Hijab Dar Iran, Khatarat-i Taj
al-Saltaneh.
23- Following the regime's
defeat in the Provincial and District Councils Bill disturbances, the
government tried to distract public attention from this disgrace by
making plans to commemorate January 7 (Dey 17 AHS) and turn it into
a day of national celebration employing women of doubtful propriety and
women with connections to imperialist circles who planned a parade,
celebrations and demonstrations. When Imam became aware of the decision,
he sent a message to government officials stating that if the government
decided to carry out its demonstration on January 7, the Islamic
`ulama would announce a national day of mourning in commemoration
of the disaster at the Gauhar Shad Mosque and would request the public
to stop work and participate in a street demonstration to express their
hatred of those who caused that bloody disaster. This message was so
effective that the regime changed its plans.
24- The Karaj Dam was
built on the Karaj river, seventeen kilometres from Karaj, sixty-three
kilometres from Tehran, in December 1958 (Azar 1337 AHS). Initial
construction work began in 1952 (1331 AHS), then in 1956 (1335 AHS)
the International Engineering Company (Harza) was assigned to
the project. After
the foreign consulting engineers accepted Harza's proposals, the dam's
building contract was ratified by the Planning Organisation.
25- Meaning the period of
Islam's power to the 4th and 5th centuries after hijra (i.e. 11th
and 12th centuries AD).
26- Riza Khan, who dreamt of
attaining power similar to that of Hitler's Germany, ordered the
construction of a steel mill by the German company Krupp. The Krupp Co.
chose the Karaj river as a suitable area to build the factory
because it was near the Alborz mines. Most of the equipment and tools
needed to build the factory were brought in from Germany at great
expense and taken to the Karaj area. But after Iran was occupied by the
Allied forces, not only did the Germans stop working and sending the
remainder of the equipment but it is said that they made the Iranian
government destroy the equipment they had already sent. In this way,
great sums of money paid by the oppressed people of Iran were completely
wasted.
27- Twenty-seven years had
passed since the issuance of the decree for the removal of the Islamic
covering (kashf hijab) up until the time of this
speech.
28- The Shah's emphasis
on the presence of women in the offices was merely to cloak imperialist
Western policies, spread corruption, narcotize the youth and promote
Western culture. The
status of women was
lowered during the time of Riza Khan and his son, first by British and
then American schemes which isolated Muslim women from social
activities.
29- After the abolition of the
Provincial and District Councils Bill, some of the `ulama
considered the struggle over and in a telegram to the Shah, thanked him
for repealing the bill. However, Imam was convinced that the
struggle must continue until news of the bill's annulment was
printed in the newspapers. This difference of opinion resulted in
contradictory rumours and news which confused many people. The people
went to Qum to clarify their obligations and Imam gave the government
the ultimatum that it must announce the annulment of the bill in the
national newspapers.
30- Sura
Al-i-Imran (The Family of Imran) verse 139.
31- Refers to the elderly clergymen such as
Ayatullah Tunakabuni and Ayatullah Bihbihani who were over ninety years
of age. See footnote 6 of this speech.
32- Japalaq is an area in
Isfahan.
33- Ayatullah Hajj Aqa
Husayn Tabataba'i better known as Ayatullah Burujirdi (1873-1961 AD) the
leader of the theological centre of Qum (after Ayatullah Hairi), founder
of the A`zam Mosque of Qum, and highest ranking Shi`i marja`-i
taqlid (since September 1941 {Shahrivar 1320 AHS}) during the reign
of Muhammad Riza Shah. After his preliminary studies in Burujird, he
went to Isfahan and taught religious jurisprudence and philosophy there
for eight years. He then studied for another eight years with Akhund
Muhammad Kazem Khurasani in Najaf. He returned to Iran and began
teaching logic and doctrinal scriptures in Burujird. In 1944 (1323 AHS),
he was invited to Qum by Imam and the other `ulama. The defeat of
the constitutional movement and events such as the execution of Shaykh
Fazlullah Nuri, as well as the troubles arising from unsuccessful
political actions taken against Riza Khan, led Ayatullah Burujirdi to
avoid involvement in political matters wherever possible, out of fear
that such
involvement would
prove to be detrimental to the Muslims. For this reason, he was
sometimes the object of criticism. In order to take advantage of the
reputation of this great man, Muhammad Riza would visit him frequently
and in a show of piety for the people would announce his readiness to
disseminate Islam.
34- One of the Shah's
statements.
35- Sura Ra`d
(Thunder), Verse 28.
36- This was said in
admonition
|